How companies benefit from decentralized data management

Data mesh describes the way in which companies manage and use their data. As an advanced concept of data architecture, a data mesh aims to overcome the challenges of centralized data structures and create a decentralized, agile data landscape. It enables the connection of data owners, data producers and data consumers to improve the exchange of information and make data-driven processes more efficient. A data mesh views data as valuable products that are managed independently by the respective domain experts and made available to other teams. But how exactly does this concept work, what are the underlying principles, and what are the advantages and disadvantages of implementing it?
This article provides a comprehensive insight into the world of the data mesh and shed light on how companies can benefit from this pioneering data architecture.
Data mesh describes a concept for data architecture in companies that aims to decentralize data management and improve data-driven processes.
The goal is to connect data owners, data producers, and data consumers. According to its founder, Zhamak Dehghani, the data mesh concept should primarily address those challenges where centralized and monolithic data structures reach their limits. This applies above all to the organization and accessibility of data.
In the data mesh approach, data is viewed as a product and the consumers of this data should be treated as customers. The principle of viewing data as a product aims to address the problems of data quality and outdated data silos, also known as “dark data.” Dark data is the information that organizations collect, process, and store as part of their regular business activities, but generally do not use for other purposes.
Data mesh and data fabric describe two approaches to data architecture, but they have different focuses.
While data mesh focuses on decentralized data management and the autonomy of data-owning teams, aiming to treat data as products and promoting self-service capabilities, data fabric is an integrated data approach that seamlessly connects an organization's various data stores, data sources, and data processing technologies. It emphasizes the uniformity and consistency of data access and transformations and strives for centralized data control to provide a consistent view of the data.
In terms of data security, data mesh places responsibility on individual teams, while a data fabric enables centralized data security. Data mesh emphasizes the responsibility of teams for data governance, while data fabric can include centralized data governance. Data mesh is suitable for complex and scalable data landscapes, while a data fabric is designed to facilitate the end-to-end connection and processing of large amounts of data across different systems.
Despite the different focuses of data mesh and data fabric, the two approaches can be combined to develop a consistent data strategy and generate benefits from both approaches. One option is to implement a data fabric as the basic data infrastructure on which the data mesh concept is based. This provides a unified view of the data, enables data integration across different systems, and supports the scalability of the data infrastructure. This gives teams in the data mesh a solid foundation for accessing high-quality, integrated data without having to worry about the technical aspects of data integration.
An alternative approach is to implement parts of the data mesh into the data fabric strategy. Specifically, this means that responsibility for the data is distributed not only to central units, but also to the individual teams in the data fabric. Each team becomes a so-called “data product owner” for the data it manages. This approach reinforces decentralized responsibility and collaboration, as defined by the data mesh concept. At the same time, the data fabric ensures that the infrastructure is in place so that data integration, data quality, and data governance are consistent and efficient across all teams.
Similar to a data fabric, a data lake describes an approach to data architecture that differs from a data fabric or data mesh, but also has some similarities. A data lake is a central repository that stores large amounts of unstructured and structured data from various sources. It offers a cost-effective way to store data before it is analyzed or loaded into other systems. Data can be easily consolidated and analyzed in a data lake, making it a valuable tool for big data analytics.
In contrast, a data mesh is decentralized, as it distributes responsibility for the data to the teams that own the data in the domains. Each team is responsible for managing its own data and making it available to other teams via standardized interfaces. This achieves closer integration between the business areas and the data itself, which increases agility and flexibility.
Although a data mesh and a data lake (as well as a data fabric) represent different approaches, they can be combined in some situations. For example, a data lake could serve as a foundation on which the principles of data mesh or data fabric are applied to enable decentralized data responsibility or a unified data infrastructure. Alternatively, a data lake could serve as a central data source that is useful for different domains. Even within a data mesh, individual teams and domains can generate their own data lakes to organize their data.
The Data Mesh concept is based on the following 4 principles:
As a modern architecture concept, the data mesh decentralizes data management in companies and makes data available where it is created. This is intended to break down silos, improve data quality and accelerate data-driven processes. However, like any concept, the data mesh brings with it both advantages and challenges, which we will examine in more detail below.
Scalability and Agility: With Data Mesh, companies can flexibly adapt their data architecture to growing requirements. Instead of burdening central bottlenecks, the individual domains scale independently and react more quickly to changes in the market. This increases efficiency and shortens the time to market for new solutions.
Higher Data Quality Through Domain Responsibility: When specialist teams treat their own data like products, quality increases. They know the business contexts best and can ensure consistency and relevance. Prerequisite: clear governance and quality standards.
Democratized Data Access: Self-service access to data facilitates its use throughout the company - not just for data scientists. When implemented correctly, this promotes innovation, accelerates decision-making processes and reduces dependencies on central IT teams.
Reduced Complexity and Dependencies: By distributing responsibility and using modern platforms, the burden of central infrastructures is reduced. Automation and standardization make complex processes manageable and at the same time reduce dependencies that often lead to bottlenecks in traditional architectures.
Security, Compliance and Trust: Decentralized data architectures do not have to be insecure - on the contrary: with automated guidelines and policy-as-code, access controls, auditability and regulatory requirements can be reliably implemented. This strengthens trust among customers and partners.
Greater Complexity: The distribution of data responsibility across many domains increases complexity. Different data sources, pipelines and technologies need to be integrated. Without clear processes for data protection, data security and integration, this can quickly become confusing and error-prone.
Governance and Data Quality: When data responsibility is spread across many teams, it becomes more difficult to enforce uniform standards and guidelines. The risk: inconsistencies in data quality and interpretation, as well as potential gaps in security and compliance.
Coordination Challenges: A decentralized model requires intensive coordination between domain teams. Communication and synchronization across departments, locations and time zones cause additional overhead and can slow down projects.
Cultural Hurdles: Data Mesh means an organizational cultural change: more autonomy for teams, less central control. This requires new responsibilities, new ways of working and often a different mindset when dealing with data.
Increased Costs and Implementation Effort: Switching from a centralized data architecture to a data mesh involves investments in technology, training and change management. Costs and effort increase in the short term before long-term efficiency gains take effect.
In large companies, departments such as Marketing, Finance or Operations often require their own context-specific data analyses. With Data Mesh, the respective teams manage their data products themselves and provide them in high quality. This eliminates dependency on a central data department and allows decisions to be made more quickly.
Data Mesh views data as products that are clearly defined, documented and reusable for other teams. For example, an e-commerce company can develop a standardized order data product that contains transaction details as well as information on delivery status, returns and payment methods. Dieses Datenprodukt kann dann von der Logistik genutzt werden, um Lieferketten zu optimieren, und vom Kundensupport, um Anfragen schneller und präziser zu bearbeiten. In this way, once a data product has been maintained, it creates added value for several areas of the company.
Teams can access quality-assured data products from other domains without long waiting times due to central IT processes. This enables fast A/B tests, pilot projects or market experiments. As a result, companies increase their agility and bring new ideas to market faster.
In this case, it is not just a central data science team that develops AI models. Specialist departments such as HR, marketing or risk management can also train their own machine learning applications directly on their domain data. The proximity to the data increases the precision and technical relevance of the models, while common standards ensure that governance and security requirements are met.
Introducing a data mesh requires careful planning and step-by-step implementation. The following describes the standard procedure for implementing a data mesh in a company:
There are various solutions and tools available to help companies successfully implement a data mesh:
A data mesh is a decentralized approach to data architecture designed to improve how organizations manage and use their data. It connects data owners, producers, and consumers by treating data as a product and enabling self-service access. With benefits such as scalability, greater data democratization, reduced complexity, and improved interoperability, a data mesh can create significant value for companies.
When combined with other approaches like a data fabric or a data lake, a data mesh helps organizations strengthen their overall data management, foster cross-team collaboration, and fully leverage the advantages of decentralized data ownership.
Share this post: